Iron Dome Launches IPR Missiles – More Drama and Intrigue in the IPR World

Authored by Michelle Carniaux and Michael E. Sander

Yet another novel business model focused on IPR petitions appears to have emerged in the patent litigation industry. We previously discussed IPR petitions filed by New Bay Capital LLC, which were speculated to have been filed on behalf of a hedge fund to shift the stock price of a publicly traded patent assertion entity.

Click here to continue reading…

Petitioners: Don’t Forget Procedure!

Authored by Michelle Carniaux and Michael E. Sander

While developing an inter partes review petition, it is easy to get so focused on the substance of the invalidity challenge and expert declaration that PTAB procedure and practice guidelines are left as an afterthought. However, as has been shown time and time again, the PTAB relies on its procedures to help keep post grant proceedings streamlined. As the dockets of the PTAB Administrative Patent Judges become heavier, one can expect the importance of procedure to become even greater. Two (related) practices that appear to frustrate PTAB Judges are: (1) incorporating into the petition by reference portions of declarations or other exhibits, and (2) insufficiently explaining in the petition how claim elements are met.

Click here to continue reading…

Instituted Patent Claims Survive in About One Third of All IPR Trials

Authored by Michelle Carniaux and Michael E. Sander

It has been a little more than one year since the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (“PTAB”) issued their first final written decision in an inter partes review and accordingly. Since then, by our calculation, the PTAB has issued 91 Final Written Decisions in IPR proceedings.1

Click here to continue reading…